xenith >> editorials >> pop
Pop
by Maysa Hattab

        Remember a time when we all screamed as one for the latest uniformly clad super-group to hit the charts? When we waved banners emblazoned with hearts and various monosyllabic names, whose identity mystified our parents, and swayed in time to a ballad, which while making millions, seemed to epitomise all that was great about preteen romance. The videos--with the customary windswept beaches, and a tanned, tapered specimen of preened loveliness--were wholesome enough, but with a tantalising hint of the adult glamour and sophistication we all thought we had. Staring moodily into the lens and crooning in tones to make hearts melt, in the arms of some equally gorgeous creature fresh from drama school, whose name would soon adorn every tabloid in the land. The pulse of the latest dance craze, a low-key, sugared version of what we would listen to in three or four years time, the soundtrack to your school disco. What happened to all that?
        Did the big-name record companies suddenly stop churning out guaranteed hits? Of course not. We grew up, apart from this world, to explore new frontiers within our incipient adolescence--more make-up, less skirt, cigarettes, Alco pops--we’d done it all, now it was time to move on. Instead of the packaged, conveyor-belt tunes, gleaming dental work and exposed midriffs, gone were the clean-shaven, fresh faced young things with wide eyes and bee-stung lips. Now we favoured greasy locks, stubble, piercings, baggy clothing, guitars, and loud drums giving life to the rasp and groan of our new icons over the microphone: "Real Music." Suddenly we reverted to the tastes of our parents we had so industriously shunned--punk, rock, metal. Finally, escape from the system, authority, school, and the shackles of a controlling and controlled media--true rebellion. We’d seen the light and emerged from it into a haze of pot smoke and thick black eyeliner, or the ostentatious glitter of a vast diamond crucifix from the neck of the latest rap star to make millions and spell creatively. Pop was now a dirty word.
        Soon enough, youth across the nation split into many, often warring factions, each wearing their choice of music flagrantly; a badge of honour, a status symbol. Suddenly, being "cool" as defined by the likes of Britney Spears--the perfect American High School scenario, complete with cheerleaders--had become uncool, a virtue extolled to excess by MTV addicts. Of course, this became as irritating in its own way soon enough, for the record companies and media finally began to grasp this new concept--each faction was catered to by magazines, television, music channels, and radio. Everywhere you look, someone is sending subtle signals as to what your identity should be. So much for the underground movement. The styles of the bleak demeanour of nu-metal, or the brash, street-inspired glamour of rap have long since moved away from the street corners and basements in which they were conceived. And as we continue to aid the sale of records, we fuel this change--the fame, fortune and falsity we shunned in pop had been, and would be now, of our own making. And yet there are those who would dismiss the mainstream as lowbrow, simply because it is mainstream, failing to realise, that any amount of talent becomes secondary in the face of popularity. That music is now an expression of self, a face we present to the world, and as much a part of that as our clothes and possessions. If so, many of us--because of this exclusivity, the fickle shifting from one genre to another as it gains credibility--are in danger of becoming the shallow, one-dimensional creatures we so despised.
        Celebrity does have its advantages, a way of connecting people otherwise divided by distance and lifestyle to something huge, entertaining, memorable. The recent glut of nostalgic television is a part of this; despite the unique paths that we take, we might perhaps all fondly remember one thing. But are the products of popstars worth less attention than Madonna, Limp Bizkit, Linkin Park, Destiny’s Child, or N’Sync?
        Perhaps it is merely prejudice which prompts our selectiveness, another, perhaps more subtle version of the status seeking which leads preteens in droves to the next big thing. Our choices, including those in music, make us who we are, build our friendships, more so perhaps, than in the past. We all want to belong, a tenet that seems to have taken on an all-consuming power. But what is that worth when you no longer have the freedom to enjoy music in your own way, in all its diversity? Who says you can’t idolise Marilyn Manson, while knowing by heart the lyrics of Eminem, but preferring to dance around your bedroom to Kylie?  Why is pop a dirty word? Because we have made it one.

Click here to read previous editorials.

 

 

    YOUR E-MAIL: